Not really. The meatball defense attempts to explain the positive, but still leaves the athlete subject to sanction under the strict liability doctrine.
Landis is denying the test was positive, because they read their instruments incorrectly, and claims to be able to prove it.
Very different.
More than you can possibly want to know is available at trust but verify
1 Comments:
Not really. The meatball defense attempts to explain the positive, but still leaves the athlete subject to sanction under the strict liability doctrine.
Landis is denying the test was positive, because they read their instruments incorrectly, and claims to be able to prove it.
Very different.
More than you can possibly want to know is available at trust but verify
TBV
Post a Comment
<< Home